<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NO PLANS TO CHANGE SA GAUGE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railwaysafrica.com/2010/02/no-plans-to-change-sa-gauge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railwaysafrica.com/2010/02/no-plans-to-change-sa-gauge/</link>
	<description>The Authoritative African Rail Publication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:58:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.railwaysafrica.com/2010/02/no-plans-to-change-sa-gauge/comment-page-1/#comment-1902</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railwaysafrica.com/?p=9445#comment-1902</guid>
		<description>A reaignment of tracks, cutting out sharpish curves, more tunnels and bridges (instead of hugging the landscape) would probably achieve the same results as a shift to standard guage - and cost much less. The main advantage of broader gauges is surely the ability to go double-deck or double stack with greater stability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reaignment of tracks, cutting out sharpish curves, more tunnels and bridges (instead of hugging the landscape) would probably achieve the same results as a shift to standard guage &#8211; and cost much less. The main advantage of broader gauges is surely the ability to go double-deck or double stack with greater stability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.railwaysafrica.com/2010/02/no-plans-to-change-sa-gauge/comment-page-1/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator>John Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railwaysafrica.com/?p=9445#comment-1899</guid>
		<description>If Mr Wells was correctly reported on the issue of gauge, and only said ....&quot;will allow faster speeds&quot;, them I&#039;m afraid that TFR&#039;s Management is out of touch with the reality and the scope of the narrow gauge problem.
Faster speeds are only one of the benefits of standard gauge; the major benefits however relate to being able to operate double-stack container wagons, to be able to source more powerful and efficient locomotives, to not pay a premium for narrow gauge rolling stock (freight or passenger), to be able to source relatively cheap secondhand rolling stock, to achieve higher levels of safety (overturning) - the list goes on and on.
So I am afraid that if this is considered view of TFR Management, goodbye TFR, you are now well on the slippery slope!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Mr Wells was correctly reported on the issue of gauge, and only said &#8230;.&#8221;will allow faster speeds&#8221;, them I&#8217;m afraid that TFR&#8217;s Management is out of touch with the reality and the scope of the narrow gauge problem.<br />
Faster speeds are only one of the benefits of standard gauge; the major benefits however relate to being able to operate double-stack container wagons, to be able to source more powerful and efficient locomotives, to not pay a premium for narrow gauge rolling stock (freight or passenger), to be able to source relatively cheap secondhand rolling stock, to achieve higher levels of safety (overturning) &#8211; the list goes on and on.<br />
So I am afraid that if this is considered view of TFR Management, goodbye TFR, you are now well on the slippery slope!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
